When
reading The Moonstone you quickly begin to see (or at least you should be
seeing) plenty of things throughout that could be seen as opposites or
juxtapositions; subjective knowledge vs. objective knowledge, belonging vs.
otherness, men vs. women, and the list could go on. However, one of the
juxtapositions that really caught my eye, especially in the end of the story,
is the idea of religion vs. spirituality. In the novel this drastic difference
is portrayed by Godfrey Ablewhite and Miss Clack for religion and the Indian
trio for spirituality.
Despite
Miss Clack constantly referring to Godfrey as her ‘Christian hero’, throughout
the novel we see that he simply cannot fill those shoes. In the beginning we are
led to believe that he is at least an okay guy; he is well educated, a
philanthropist, helps lead women’s charity groups, and may actually really love
Rachel (though we know we were all rooting for Franklin). The evidence against
him culminate throughout the novel as we see that the charities he is helping
with are not that charitable, he has been embezzling money from a boy he has
care over, he wanted to marry Rachel for the money, and to top it off, he is
the one who truly stole the Moonstone! He uses his ‘Christianity’ as a cover
for all the deplorable things he does. If he were not involved as he was, he
would not have the opportunity to misuse the amount of trust placed in him.
Miss
Clack seems to be more consumed with religion and gossip than anything
spiritual. She makes sure that she always attends church. She always leaves
obnoxious pamphlets all over her friends’ and family’s homes in an attempt to
save their immortal souls. She has no drama in her life and enjoys snooping
into others at any given moment. She also makes sure that she helps out with
charities, even though her main one is not that charitable. All the children
have plenty of pants (too many actually), but the men have none and have to
spend more money that they do not have to buy more, or miss work because they
have no pants. Then we top that wonderful character off with a plentiful
helping of piousness.
At
the end of the novel when we get to see the true sacrifice that our Indian trio
went through is when we get a real picture of real spirituality. These men
sacrificed their rather important stations in their society to act as
performers to get closer to the precious relic. They sacrificed the comforts of
their homeland. These misfortunes they whole heartedly accept for the good of
their religion. Self-sacrifice was a necessity for the good of their religion.
Now they will have to part ways and wander the land as pilgrims for the rest of
their days, even though they succeeded in their quest. They were well aware of
the consequences when they set out for the moonstone. None of this mattered.
Could we ever see Godfrey or Drusilla (Miss Clack) ever going to these lengths
for something spiritual, even though they parade themselves around as such
spiritual people?
Interesting observations on the differences between the avowed Christian figures and the Hindu characters. It makes me think of Betteredge as well. Robinson Crusoe is his Bible, in ways, but the way he uses it tends to be for good or at least ebnign reasons. He values it highly and wishes others did too, but he doesn't overdo it like Clack, in particular.
ReplyDeleteYour ideas remind me of my own blog on Miss Clack! I see her religious beliefs as definitely self-serving and false, like you, but I never thought about the Indian's spirituality at the end in those terms. Now that I think about it though, that end scene with the ritual and the diamond is much more spiritually "real" than anything Miss Clack ever showed. Great blog!
ReplyDelete